User Nominations

userYou’re invited to submit news reports, editorials or other published commentary you feel is worthy of the Wall of Shame or the Wall of Fame. Create an account so you can post your own critique or recommendation.

Help bust pro-growth bias in the media. Join the Truth Squad.
Donate Now

Explore all our non-profit sustainability initiatives at GrowthBusters.

Register to get email alerts or submit stories.

"We're all sitting ducks" -Princeton professor Michael Oppenheimer

Posted by on in User Nominations
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 725
  • 2 Comments
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/30/un-climate-change-report_n_5060317.html

To improve your adaptation, see, for instance,https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E9tBWaweSFLRtZ0Agj4vdVKPknF9uINXmiC4kzp0nEY/edit

Orlov focuses on economic threats, but his adaptation advice is relevant to the collapse in general.

Last modified on
How much fame or shame?:
0

Comments

  • Dave Gardner
    Dave Gardner Monday, 31 March 2014

    Thanks for posting this, Grant. Very good reporting and it's great to see scientists telling it like it is. Very telling that one scientist withdrew because he doesn't want to be "alarmist." That kind of PC BS is what got us into this mess (among other things).

    Reply Cancel
  • Grant
    Grant Monday, 31 March 2014

    Thanks. I heard that the major IPCC reports have to be approved by every U.N. member, even the OPEC countries, who often insist that language be watered down well below the level of alarm the authors intended. I don't know the details on this process though. Amazingly, IPCC many scientists are not even funded enough to do their IPCC work as their primary job. For instance, Chairman Pachauri has a separate full-time job (and is busy--in a podcast interview with him, he was at home and I could hear kids running around). So the IPCC makes a Herculean contribution under the circumstances, but has been seen to consistently underestimate threats or embed them alongside unrealistic best-case scenarios. Last I checked, emissions were exceeding even the _worst-case_ IPCC scenario from AR4, the A1FI scenario.

Leave your comment

Guest Wednesday, 22 October 2014

Get Involved!

GrowthBiasBusted.org is an interactive online community where you can vote, discuss and even post stories about bias in the media. Get involved today!
Post Your Own Story

How Can I Help?

This is a donor-supported non-profit project. Your tax-deductible donation allows us to continue pushing the media to improve growth issues coverage.
Donate Now