Growth rainbow and chainsaw

Carpenter Takes Buzz Saw to Economic Growth

This is not the first time in history some profound wisdom was conveyed by a carpenter. Erik Lindberg is not a professor, reformed Wall Street financier, economist, physicist, or even Tibetan monk. He’s just a carpenter with a Ph.D. in English and Comparative Literature, and a guy who has taken the time to sit back and ponder what the fuck we are doing here on Earth in the 21st century. I want to applaud and recommend his two-part treatise published at Resilience.org

Growthism

Growthism Part 2

First of all, some of his observations are unusually on-point for Growth Bias Busted, where every week we try to take the power away from this phenomenon:

“I heard an NPR business update announce that economists were predicting ‘a healthy holiday shopping season.’ Such reports are a near-daily happening, and their words of praise, sometimes warning, have come to be accepted with little question…. But healthy for what? Is the health of our families and our children the concern of such reports? A healthy shopping season may mean a mound of presents under the tree, but will this give comfort to our distracted minds, our scattered consciousness? Can any still and simple purpose claw its way to the top of such a growing mountain of stuff? Do the throwaway toys and the ‘look how much he loves me’ jewelry, the most advanced personal devices, or bow-festooned Lexus SUV’s create more of anything we truly need—more love or joy, contentment, peace, simple time with others? Is it healthy for the Chinese workers who must pump out a strange assortment of bizarre looking plastic pieces beneath the yellow smog which hangs as a choking menace over their cities? Is it healthy for the African gold and diamond miners, pushed ever harder and more cruelly as demand increases? It certainly isn’t healthy for our environment, our overburdened planet, which first must supply the raw materials and then absorb the waste.”

You’ve probably heard or read it before, but Lindberg does a pretty fine job of collecting into one essay a convincing indictment of what modern society has come to accept not only as “normal,” but as desirable. Perhaps BECAUSE he’s not an economist or scientist, he captures beautifully the ugly truth about our obsession with MORE.

“Of course we all know at some level what a ‘healthy shopping season’ is really healthy for: the economy…. But what is “the economy”? Is it a mere name–like the harvest, the kill, or the catch–that in this case we give to the assembly of transactions we make? It seems more alive and willful than that, full of demands of its own. It provides us with our daily bread, and sometimes much more—but at any moment this could come to an end. For it stands above and apart from us. It has requirements distinct from ours. It must be fed. We are conscripted by it. It demands our sacrifices…. But most of all, the economy must grow, a terrible fact that most of us accept without question, we imperiled mortals in the hands of this angry and petulant God.”

Rarely do we stop and consider what prisoners we are of “the economy,” shackled to a hamster-wheel on which we must run, to earn more, to buy more, to consume more, to feed the beast.

“This need to grow—Growthism—is the foundation of our current condition and the key concept of our present worldview. It has become a sort of theology and advanced democracies are equally theocracies of Growthism. It is our official ideology, but not in the common partisan sense of the word. Rather, it describes a value or a good that is mainly invisible and obediently accepted without question.”

Yes. I love that – “invisible and obediently accepted without question.” What he said. Along with:

“None of this is true.”

“…growth, this way, vs. growth, that way, are the only options we have at the polling place.”

“…just when it looked like we may have reached the limits of growth, Growthism became an earnest, though idolatrous belief.”

In part 2 of his treatise, Lindberg again visits the very reason for the existence of Growth Bias Busted:

“This sense of normalcy can be seen in the way journalists, academics, and politicians speak about economic growth. An economy that is not growing, of course, in recession and has only ‘recovered’ once it is growing again at an acceptable rate, around 3% per year, a rate often extolled with genetic metaphors—as if this sort of growth part of ‘the economy’s’ DNA. An economy that is not growing or not growing fast enough is, accordingly, referred to as ‘sluggish’ or will be said to be ‘facing headwinds,’ ones like insufficient consumer confidence, high energy prices, an international trade imbalance, or even demographic changes. This is quite odd if considered outside the perspective of Growthism: the fact, say, that the population is growing older or that people are having fewer babies could be considered mainly as an economic challenge, never mind the more basic fact that an economy’s size and growth has to do with how much people are buying and selling and that people might someday decide they have everything they need. That any pause in buying, selling, and of course disposing, is a condition from which we must recover is the most peculiar thing, yet it is accepted without thought.”

I’m sharing such large slices of this enlightening pie for fear you may not stop and read Growthism parts 1 and 2 in full. Part of the very problem Lindberg describes is the world we’ve created where we can’t afford to sit on a rock and spend the afternoon reading something deep and thoughtful. It may take you 20 minutes to read it. Will you invest the time? I hope so. If you are tempted to slow down and read more than 140 characters at a sitting, you may want to explore more of Lindberg’s work. Aside from the need for some punctuation editing, this guy can write. Welcome Erik Lindberg to the Wall of Fame.

“Lost in the normalizing of economic growth, in addition to any awareness about its lethal outcome, is the sense that economic growth and modernity in general are part of a very specific historical conditions, and not the simple releasing of a dammed up river. And because these conditions cannot last, as important as asserting this fact, unknown to most of the knowledge-makers and power-brokers in Liberal societies, is thinking about our present historical condition in ways that will help us choose, if that’s the right word, an alternative.”

Learn more about GrowthBusting and how to join the effort:
Become a GrowthBuster

Tags: , , ,

Trackback from your site.

Dave Gardner

Producer of the documentary, GrowthBusters: Hooked on Growth. Dave writes and speaks regularly on the subject of growth addiction, including the pro-growth media bias that perpetuates prosperity-from-growth mythology.

Comments (1)

  • Avatar

    verdulo1

    |

    I agree 99%. The part that doesn’t fit is this: “African gold and diamond miners, pushed ever harder and more cruelly as demand increases?”. This could be easily fixed by giving the miners a greater share of the profits. Then what motivation would they have to oppose growth? Inequality of income and exploitation of workers are not good and should be stopped. But how are they related to economic growth? Would the miners be treated any better if we stopped buying their products?

    Reply

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Get Involved!

GrowthBiasBusted.org is an interactive online community where you can vote, discuss and even submit stories about bias in the media. Get involved today!
Submit a Story

How Can I Help?

This is a donor-supported non-profit project. Your tax-deductible donation allows us to continue pushing the media to improve growth issues coverage.
Donate Now

Wall Of Shame

Reporting & commentary that assume eternal growth is feasible, good, and necessary for prosperity.

Wall Of Fame

Reporting & commentary that recognize growth has limits, costs, and consequences.


User Nominated

Examples of classic pro-growth bias or exceptional acknowledgement of limits to growth, submitted by our readers!.


Top Voted

Every Friday we honor the week’s top-voted story, from the Wall of Shame, Wall of Fame, or User Nominations.

Citizen-Powered Media – 2016